| |
Saint
Anthony was a Franciscan. Obviously, because in 1220
he left the Augustinian Order and joined the followers of Francis
of Assisi, becoming a "minor monk." Son and disciple
of Francis, but broadly speaking, toned down, original.
Anthony is deeply "Franciscan," but he lived his "Franciscanism"
with his own particular spiritual sensibility, with his temperament
and on the basis of his cultural formation, in addition to the
pure and simple testimony of the Gospel.
When
did Francis and Anthony meet? What are the differences
and the originalities that distinguish them? What are the convergences,
the elements in common between the two saints? What kind
of Franciscan was Anthony? Is it possible to speak of
a direct dependence on Francis and his spirituality?
The
two saints were contemporaries for six years, from
1220 to 1226, in the order of the Minor Monks. Their personal
contacts, as far as we know, were minimal, spread out
over three brief meetings.
- We
know that Saint Anthony participated at the General Chapter
of the Mats, celebrated in Assisi in May 1221. It lasted
about one week and a varied assembly of 3,000 monks participated
in it. Anthony, among the crowd, saw Francis and heard
him speak. That is it. We have no evidence of a meeting
between the two saints. Given the situation, it would
have been impossible. Francis was overburdened with
problems, thick and urgent, and he was not in good health.
His time was carefully scheduled. Those attending were disorderly.
Anthony was only a young novice, unknown by anyone,
back from a failed missionary expedition: he was a personality
that had yet to emerge.
- The
only testimony we have of a second contact between the
two is an affectionate note, full of veneration and
esteem, that Francis sent to Anthony "his bishop,"
between the end of 1223 and the beginning of 1224
in Bologna. With this, he authorised him to teach theology
to the monks, but asking him to ensure that this did
not interfere with prayer. The significance of that note
is that Francis invested Anthony with the role of preacher
and teacher of theology ex cathedra. It
is the historic seal on Anthony's decision and the way in
which Anthony embarked on the road of predication. The note
also represents the direction which the Franciscan movement
would take: to come into line with the pastoral needs required
by the historical and the ecclesiastical moment, as their
Dominican contemporaries had decided. Another sign of this
direction was a change in the style of predication: the
modus concionandi, typical of Francis, was completely
set aside to return to the development of a traditional
religious sermon, which the saint enriched and
elaborated upon.
-
A third "meeting" has Francis as its
main actor. He appeared at the Chapter of Arles,
in 1224 (the days of the stigmata!), while Anthony
was holding a sermon for the monks on the theme of the
cross. Only one monk, Monaldo, had a vision, not even
Anthony did; the others participated in its presence only
indirectly. However, this was still in the context of an
assembly, not an intimate, friendly meeting held apart in
confidence. The image of the praedicator is
the one that most commonly identifies Anthony's presence
in the Franciscan Sources. It is interesting to note the
reference to an assembly - during a Chapter - of monks
convened to be prepared for predication by scholarly
men like Anthony.
|